Policy regarding Monitoring & Review of Ratings
Last Reviewed On: September 24, 2020 (Version 2.0)
Any security / instrument / bank
loan facility rated by Acuité shall be subject to continuous surveillance
throughout the life time of the rated instrument. The following
process/guideline shall be followed for the same:
- The
Rating, once accepted, is kept under constant surveillance throughout life
of the instrument / facility (or until the rating is withdrawn) by
monitoring developments within the rated entity, various economic and
industry level factors that may influence the movement of the rating.
- To
facilitate the surveillance and the review process, the rating analyst
will seek updated information (financial / non-financial) from
the client periodically. A review is conducted in periodic frequency as
per Acuité’s policies and prevalent SEBI / RBI guidelines. A review may
also be conducted sooner, should there be a material event that warrants such a review
on an out of turn basis.
- In
case the above data /information collected indicates the possibility of an
impact on the creditworthiness of the rated entity, are view note is
prepared and presented to the Rating Committee. Revision, if any, in
the rating assigned by the Rating Committee is communicated to the rated
entity and published on Acuité’s website.
- At least one
review should be conducted as under - For Bonds & Debentures: once
every 365 days (i.e. the no. of days between the two rating committee
meetings where the case is discussed should not exceed 365 days). For bank
loan facilities: once every 455 days (i.e. the no. of days between
the two rating committee meetings where the case is discussed should not
exceed 455 days).
- In
case of non-cooperating rated entities where
surveillance is not possible due to non-availability of requisite data or
Acuité is of the opinion that the data is incorrect / not true, or
non-receipt of surveillance fee, Acuité will conduct the rating review
based on publicly available information and on best effort basis. In such
cases, the suffix "Issuer not cooperating*” shall be added to the
rating symbol. The asterisk mark shall be explained as "Issuer did not
co-operate; Based on best available information”.