Policy regarding Monitoring & Review of Ratings
Last Reviewed On: June 27, 2022 (Version 3.0)
Any security / instrument / bank
loan facility rated by Acuité shall be subject to continuous surveillance
throughout the life time of the rated instrument. The following
process/guideline shall be followed for the same:
- The
Rating, once accepted, is kept under constant surveillance throughout life
of the instrument / facility (or until the rating is withdrawn) by
monitoring developments within the rated entity, various economic and
industry level factors that may influence the movement of the rating.
- To
facilitate the surveillance and the review process, the rating analyst
will seek updated information (financial / non-financial) from
the client periodically. A review is conducted in periodic frequency as
per Acuité’s policies and prevalent SEBI / RBI guidelines. A review may
also be conducted sooner, should there be a material event that warrants such a review
on an out of turn basis.
- In
case the above data /information collected indicates the possibility of an
impact on the creditworthiness of the rated entity, are view note is
prepared and presented to the Rating Committee. Revision, if any, in
the rating assigned by the Rating Committee is communicated to the rated
entity and published on Acuité’s website.
- At least one review should be conducted as under - For Bonds & Debentures, CP & CD program (and all forms of listed debt, regardless of the instrument name): once every 365 days (i.e. the no. of days between two consecutive press releases / rating rationales should not exceed 365 days). For bank loan facilities: once every 455 days (i.e. the no. of days between the two consecutive press releases / rating rationales should not exceed 455 days). In cases where, Acuite has outstanding ratings on both, listed debt as well as bank loans, the review timeline shall not exceed 365 days from the date of publishing the previous press release / rating rationale.
- In
case of non-cooperating rated entities where
surveillance is not possible due to non-availability of requisite data or
Acuité is of the opinion that the data is incorrect / not true, or
non-receipt of surveillance fee, Acuité will conduct the rating review
based on publicly available information and on best effort basis. In such
cases, the suffix "Issuer not cooperating*” shall be added to the
rating symbol. The asterisk mark shall be explained as "Issuer did not
co-operate; Based on best available information”.
- In situations, where Acuite has:
- Not carried out a review as per the timelines stated in point 4 above AND
- Not suffixed "Issuer not cooperating*” as per point 5 above
the details will be published under "Review Due but Not Conducted” under the disclosure requirements (Annexure A, point 4.B Disclosures - in case of delay in periodic review) as per SEBI circular SEBI/HO/MIRSD/MIRSD4/CIR/P/2016/119. The list of "Review Due but Not Conducted” is available through the link https://www.acuite.in/review-due-date.htm
This list is updated every working day and is kept current. The record pertaining to an issuer is excluded from the list only after the press release consequent to the latest rating committee is published.