Real Estate Entities

10th October 2019 (Version 2)

The real estate sector comprises entities engaged in the construction and development of residential / commercial real estate. Acuité understands that the entities engaged in real estate activities have to be assessed on a framework, which differs from the conventional framework applicable to manufacturing entities primarily on account of the following reasons:

Firstly, there exists significant time lag between revenues and cash inflows from a project. Typically, in a residential project, advances from customers are received at the inception of a project whereas in case of a commercial project, revenues may be recognised at a later point after the project is sufficiently advanced. Hence, profit for a given period may diverge significantly from cash flows. Since timely servicing of debt obligations depends on adequacy of cash flows rather than profitability, it becomes necessary to focus on cash flow adequacy for real estate projects.

Secondly, real estate activity is project-based. Each project is unique in terms of size, profitability, time requirements, among others. Since a real estate developer may be executing more than one project at a time, revenues will depend on the stage of completion of the project and sales effected. Resultantly, the revenue profile of a real estate developer may fluctuate widely from one period to another unlike that of manufacturing units, wherein revenues will typically exhibit a steady pattern. Hence, the operational and financial parameters applicable to manufacturing entities, cannot capture the nuances of that of real estate projects.

In view of the above difference, Acuité considers certain parameters specifically for the construction sector in its Risk Assessment Framework. The overall framework is based on Business Risk, Financial Risk and Management Risk assessment of the entity whose facilities are being rated.

1. Business Risk Assessment


Geographical and Segmental Diversity

Higher the geographical diversity in operations, lower is the risk inherent in the business model. Since demand supply dynamics of each region is different, geographical spread in operations imparts resilience to the revenue profile. Apart from geographical diversity, Acuité also examines the segmental diversity in the business of a real estate developer. The demand drivers for residential and commercial segments vary. While residential real estate growth is influenced by factors such as increased affordability, demographic profile of the region/city, the large number of people in the employable segment and higher preference for nuclear families, residential projects by established developers attract advances from customers which provide a major part of the initial funding. Hence, residential projects are generally funded through a mix of customer advances and promoter funding. Again, in case of customer interest, the actual user's interest is protected than that of the investor, since actual user’s demand is usually backed by housing loans that implies a steady flow of advances as construction progresses. As against this, in case of high investor interest, the flow of advances is generally linked to market conditions.

Commercial realty demand is influenced by demand from sectors such as Information technology, retail and services. Commercial projects generally attract customer interest as they approach the completion stage. Hence, cash flows from clients are usually back ended. It has been observed that residential real estate is generally sold off and hence has limited potential to generate recurring revenue streams for a developer. Commercial real estate segment, on the other hand, has the potential to generate recurring streams of revenue such as lease rentals wherever the property is given out on lease rather than an outright sale. In case the developer opts for a lease model, the developer may choose LRD (Lease rental discounting) loan, which is used to replace the construction loan.

The advantage of the leasing option is that it allows the developer to generate liquidity at regular intervals by discounting the future receivables from time to time and also gain from any upside in property prices.

In case of assessment of real estate cases under the LRD model, certain other risks such as counter party credit risk, early exit risk, interest rate risk are also examined while conducting credit assessment.

Track Record

Longer the track record, better will be the score on the market position since prospective buyers are generally keen about an established track record of execution of projects.

Brand Equity of Real Estate Developer

The brand equity of a real estate developer is critical from a customer acquisition perspective and also from the stand point of attracting funding to support the project.


Status of major projects

Entities with major projects in the initial stages of construction will score low on this parameter primarily because the likelihood of high time and cost overruns is very high. Hence, cash flow forecasting becomes difficult. Delays in receipt of approvals from government authorities are common, thereby translating to cost and time overruns.

Nature of Projects undertaken

While conventionally, real estate developers own land parcels and develop projects on these land sites, more efficient models are also in vogue such as joint development projects/ redevelopment projects. Models such as redevelopment projects / joint development projects are asset light in nature and reduce capital requirements of the developer.

Again projects with inherent modularity will score higher on this parameter. For instance, a developer developing independent villas on plots of land will have the flexibility to align the level of progress of construction undertaken to cash flows from clients. However, in case of multi storeyed structures, the builder has limited flexibility to slow down construction even in case of low demand owing to commitments made to buyers for handover the possession by specific dates. The enactment of legislation such as RERA, which stipulates penalties for non-adherence to commitments made to buyers of flats, adds to the risk.

Regulatory Framework

The enactment of RERA (Real Estate Regulatory Act) is a major step by the government in enforcing basic discipline among real estate players. RERA stipulates registration of existing / proposed projects on the website of the real estate regulator, restrictions on diversion of funds received as advances for a specific project, penalties for non-adherence to commitments, among others.

Each state will have its own RERA, which would be broadly based on the lines of the Central RERA. Other than legislations such as RERA, the real estate sector will also be influenced by interest rates and policies of the banks/financial institutions in lending to real estate.

The changes in the regulatory environment will also have an impact on the business risk profile of real estate players. Acuité factors in the regulatory environment while assessing the real estate player.

2. Financial Risk Assessment

The financial risk assessment of real estate entities will be governed by cash flow measures as opposed to conventional measures like profitability, interest coverage and Net Cash Accruals to Total Debt. Acuité focusses on the internal cash flow generation potential of the project and external cash generation potential while assessing the cash flow forecast.

Acuité seeks basic data from the client in terms of project cost, funding mix, bookings and advances received, construction work in progress till date and expected date of completion.

The projected cash flow statement is constructed and the Cash Flow Coverage Indicator is examined in this regard. The analyst may look at the base case scenario and also examine movements in the ratio under various scenarios.

Cash flow coverage Indicator = Cash inflows from customers + Infusion of additional promoter funds+ Fresh term loan drawdowns / (Cash outflows for construction+ Taxes+ Interest+ Principal repayment)

This ratio is calculated for every year across the life of the project. Acuité examines the minimum and maximum ratio across the tenure of the loan. If the ratio is likely to go below unity for any given period, Acuité examines the refinancing ability / additional fund infusion to support the operational and financial commitments. The refinancing ability has to been examined in the context of the prevailing operating environment. Typically, NBFCs are the key lenders to real estate sector, the occurrence of events which impedes the lending ability of the NBFCs will impact the financial flexibility of the lenders. The presence of marquee real estate focused private equity players as majority shareholders tends to be viewed positively from a financial flexibility standpoint especially if such players are able to demonstrate the willingness to support the ventures. Acuité also considers liquidity support like unencumbered cash balances and cash equivalents while formulating an opinion on the cash flow adequacy of the entity.

3. Management Risk Assessment

The key parameters of Integrity, risk appetite and competence are evaluated based on the following

Integrity: Past credit history, instances of delinquencies, market perception as evidenced by articles in the print and electronic media

Risk Appetite: Propensity to launch several projects over a short period which is likely to expose the balance sheet to considerable stress, excessive reliance on debt funding

Competence: Demonstrated ability to execute projects across cycles, geographies and segments.

Companies rated since 2012
Search Live Ratings
Apply For Rating
I want Acuité to contact me
Our exciting journey started in 2005 with rating of bank borrowers most of whom were small and medium enterprises. At that time, credit rating was a concept known only to large issuers of capital market instruments. Since then, like a caterpillar transforms itself into a beautiful butterfly, we transformed to rate bonds, bank facilities of large corporates and issuers across industries. Along came many achievements - SEBI Registration in 2011, RBI accreditation in 2012, 50,000 ratings in 2018, 5,000 Bond and Bank Loan Ratings in 2017, launch of India's first Android and iPhone app to disseminate rating, tamper-proof QR-code-enabled rating rationales, and SMERA Terminal to name a few.

Now is the time to re-emphasize our increasing footprint across all segments of ratings through the launch of our new name - 'Acuité'.

The name has changed. The spirit of upholding highest standards of analytical rigour, continuous improvement, excellence in our processes and quest for innovation remains the same. We would like to re-emphasize that we will continue to work hard to provide independent, unbiased and timely opinion of highest standard.

Acuité means 'sharpness and clarity of thought and vision'. Let our research and ratings help you take decisions with confidence.

Sankar Chakraborti